{% extends 'base.html' %} {% block title %}annotation{%endblock%} {% block title_num %}

Annotation {{ file_num_display }} / {{ all_num }}

{% endblock %} {% block content %}
{% csrf_token %} Your Woker ID is {{ worker_id }}

Text:

Is it valuable to pursue science for the sake of simply gaining knowledge , or does scientific knowledge only have worth if we can apply it to solving a specific problem or to bettering our lives ? This question focuses on the differences between two types of science : basic science and applied science . Basic science or `` pure '' science seeks to expand knowledge regardless of the short-term application of that knowledge . It is not focused on developing a product or a service of immediate public or commercial value . The immediate goal of basic science is knowledge for knowledge 's sake , though this does not mean that , in the end , it may not result in a practical application .

Target

  • Basic science or `` pure '' science seeks to expand knowledge regardless of the short-term application of that knowledge .
  • basic

Candidates

Please check all the words that can be used instead of the target word in the same context. Note that the morphology of the target (third person singular, past tense etc.) is considered to be applied to the candidate automatically in the process of paraphrasing.

1.vital
2.principal
3.indispensable
4.key
5.inherent
6.primary
7.essential
8.main
9.elemental
10.central
11.necessary
12.chief
13.intrinsic
14.underlying
15.primitive
{%endblock%}